A number of Western Economic Diversification Canada (WD) programs are delivered through arrangements with third parties. One advantage of third party delivery is that third parties have a closer proximity to the clients and are better able to understand client needs. In addition, provision of programs through a third party provides the potential to leverage additional resources and to build upon pre-existing working relationships.
There are a number of disadvantages to partnering with third parties to deliver programs and projects. By having a third parties delivering programs, WD is distanced from the client and therefore, WD's direct interaction with the client is limited. As well, WD is one step removed from the program delivery and is reliant on the third party to achieve results for which WD is accountable. WD must ensure that adequate controls are in place to limit this risk.
The audit focused on programs and projects in which third parties received operating, investment, loan, or project funding, and delivered services and funding to clients. The programs and projects reviewed were:
Most of these individual initiatives have been audited in the past. This audit focused on WD's general processes and controls around managing third party delivery arrangements and did not duplicate prior program-based audit work.
The approved funding and number of organizations funded are summarized in the table below.
| Program/Project | Fiscal Year | Funding ($ Million) | # of Org Funded | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Futures Program | 2007-09 | $55.3 | 94 | |
| Women's Enterprise Initiatives | 2007-09 | $7.8 | 4 | |
| Francophone Economic Development Organization | 2007-09 | $4.3 | 4 | |
| Entrepreneurs with Disabilities Program/Urban Entrepreneurs with Disabilities Program | 2007-09 | $3.1 | 11 | |
| Community Futures - Rural Diversification Initiatives (Alberta) | 2007-09 | $1.7 | 1 | Note 1 |
| Community Futures - Rural Economic Diversification Initiatives (British Columbia) | 2008-09 | $0.5 | 1 | Note 2 |
| The Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range Project | 2007-09 | $15.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | $87.70 | 116 | Note 3 |
Note 1 - CF Network of Alberta (CFNA) is the project proponent. CFNA provides funding to CFs in Alberta on a project basis.
Note 2 - Project start date - October 8, 2008. CF Development Association of (CFDA) British Columbia is the project proponent. CFDA of BC provides funding to CFs in British Columbia on a project basis.
Note 3 - Funding excludes loan funds.
The overall objective of the audit was to provide assurance that the governance, risk management framework and controls in place at WD for delivery of programs and projects by third parties were adequate to ensure the achievement of intended results.
The sub-objectives were:
The audit program was designed to test the existence and effectiveness of WD’s controls to mitigate the following key risks:
The audit covered the period from April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2009. The audit included review and analysis of relevant program and policy documents, interviews with key personnel at WD, and testing of transactions. The auditors reviewed a number of key documents including: Treasury Board Policy on Transfer Payments; The Treasury Board Directive on Transfer Payments; and The Report of the Independent Blue Ribbon Panel on Grants and Contributions Programs.
The auditors would like to thank WD staff for the timely cooperation and assistance provided to the audit team throughout this engagement.